Cem Ilkel vs Borna Gojo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Ilkel vs B. Gojo

Cem Ilkel

TUR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'5" (196 cm)

586

C. Rank

291

144

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$225.5K

Career Money

$669.6K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Borna Gojo

CRO

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'5" (196 cm)

586

C. Rank

291

144

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$225.5K

Career Money

$669.6K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Gojo

They have played 3 sets in total, with Cem Ilkel winning 2 and Borna Gojo winning 1. The last match between Cem Ilkel and Borna Gojo was at the Winnipeg Challenger, 08-07-2019, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-4 4-6 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Ilkel	1
Gojo	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Winnipeg Challenger(07-08-19)

Stats

Cem Ilkel

Borna Gojo

C. Ilkel vs B. Gojo H2H Profile

C. Ilkel	Stats	B. Gojo
$225,530	Career Prize Money	$669,560
56.52% (438-337)	Career Total W/L	58.37% (258-184)
1	Hard	0
7	Titles	2
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0.00% (0-5)

C. Ilkel vs B. Gojo Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cem Ilkel has won 67.50% of points on their second serve, while Borna Gojo has won 44.34%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cem Ilkel, in recent form, has won 45.90% of their opponent's second serve points, while Borna Gojo has won 43.96%. The same stats for first serve returns are 14.43% and 25.03% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Cem Ilkel has saved 66.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Borna Gojo has saved 55.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Cem Ilkel has won 71.43% of matches played (W/L 30/12), with Borna Gojo winning 51.35% (W/L 19/18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Cem Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 288/181), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/9). Borna Gojo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 122/77), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 10/13).
Player level: In the last year, Cem Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.32% of matches (W/L 29/9), where as Borna Gojo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.89% of matches (W/L 11/8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cem Ilkel winning 1 times and Borna Gojo being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Cem Ilkel winning 2 and Borna Gojo winning 1.
The last match between Cem Ilkel and Borna Gojo was at the Winnipeg Challenger, 08-07-2019, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-4 4-6 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:16:7.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cem Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 424.21 while Borna Gojo has played against players with an average rank of 228.78.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cem Ilkel has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Borna Gojo has won 27% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Cem Ilkel has converted 12.50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Borna Gojo has converted 28.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Cem Ilkel vs Borna Gojo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Ilkel vs B. Gojo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Ilkel	Stats	B. Gojo
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
16	Games Won	13
11	Aces (Total)	4
4	Total Double Faults	2
2:16:7	Average Match Time	2:16:7
72% (81/112)	1st Serve %	54% (46/85)
63% (51/81)	1st Serve Win %	85% (39/46)
71% (22/31)	2nd Serve Win %	46% (18/39)
20% (2/10)	Break Pts Won %	8% (1/13)
33% (28/85)	Return Points Win %	35% (39/112)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Ilkel Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Chisinau Challenger - 26-05-2025
R2 Petr Bar BiryukovP. Bar	L	6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(7)	Stats
R1 Mukund SasikumarM. Sasikumar	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
Tbilisi Challenger - 19-05-2025
Q1 Giles HusseyG. Hussey	L	7-6(4) 6-3	Stats
M25 Tbilisi - 12-05-2025
R1 Evgeny KarlovskiyE. Karlovskiy	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
M25 Sharm ElSheikh - 21-04-2025
SF Saba PurtseladzeS. Purtseladze	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

B. Gojo Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Sascha Gueymard WayenburgS. Gueymard	L	3-6 7-6(2) 6-4	Stats
Olbia Challenger - 13-10-2025
R2 Martin LandaluceM. Landaluce	L	6-3 3-6 6-3	Stats
R1 Francesco FortiF. Forti	W	7-5 6-4	Stats
Roanne Challenger - 06-10-2025
R2 Hugo GastonH. Gaston	L	5-7 7-6(3) 7-5	Stats
R1 Clement ChidekhC. Chidekh	W	6-0 4-6 7-5	Stats

View All

C. Ilkel vs B. Gojo Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Ilkel	Stats	B. Gojo
56.52% (438/337)	YTD Win/Loss	58.37% (258/184)
54.63% (979/813)	Sets Win/Loss	56.60% (600/460)
51.54% (8791/8267)	Games Win/Loss	52.51% (5519/4992)
61.41% (288/181)	Hard Win/Loss	61.31% (122/77)
44.53% (57/71)	Clay Win/Loss	54.87% (62/51)
54.76% (92/76)	Indoor Hard W/L	59.81% (64/43)
10.00% (1/9)	Grass Win/Loss	43.48% (10/13)
0.34	Aces Per Game	0.66
2865	Aces Total	3401
0.17	Double Faults Per Game	0.28
1385	Total Double Faults	1433
1:15:9	Average Match Time	1:37:46
560.68	Average Opponent Rank	438.74
58% (24152/41308)	1st Serve %	62% (19757/31639)
70% (16999/24152)	1st Serve Win %	74% (14580/19757)
51% (8757/17156)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (5864/11882)
40% (1622/4023)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (1085/2705)
39% (16247/41803)	Return Points Win %	37% (11619/31158)
31.82% (7/15)	Slam W/L	56.25% (18/14)
66.67% (2/1)	Masters W/L	50.00% (7/7)
31.82% (7/15)	Cups W/L	60.00% (9/6)
17.86% (5/23)	Main Tour W/L	48.94% (23/24)
52.23% (176/161)	Challenger W/L	60.47% (153/100)
66.39% (241/122)	Futures W/L	59.26% (48/33)
56% (426/756)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	58% (252/433)
40% (4/10)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	63% (5/8)
53% (147/275)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	52% (113/217)
56% (130/233)	Deciding Set Win %	52% (87/168)
85% (424/362)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (261/213)
14% (424/60)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (261/48)
21% (350/74)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	24% (180/43)